When guns are outlawed then only the outlaws will have guns. An important step to socializing a country is to disarm the citizens. Tyrants like Stalin, Hitler, and Mao all sought to disarm their own citizens in order to control them and ensure their own power. Sometimes you have to defend yourself as the police cannot be everywhere all the time and if my family is threatened I will not hesitate to shoot someone and will be happy to face the consequences of my actions.
Let's ban all cars cause some nut case committed a crime with a car, is that not the liberal way. I hope that criminals do some time in a jail with a friend or relative of one of the victims.
Let's ban all cars cause some nut case committed a crime with a car by transporting the weapons with it, is that not the liberal way.
A blog by Z_AC_Tech. Proud to be an exceptional American TEAhadist Conservative Infidel. Embrace the Conservative core values of low taxes, smaller government, freedom to practice religion or not if you desire, right to bear arms, a strong military and the right to an alternative education verses the failed public education. The Liberal answer let’s throw more money and regulations at the problem. Big government, big labor and big business is oppressing the common man. Reagan Akbar!
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
The Obama National Socialist Youth in training!
This is just wrong on so many levels!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4-z1Ih0ImM
The brown-shirts oops I meant purple-shirts are next. This looks a lot like Americas version of National Socialism. Progressivism creates false expectations among the poor that cannot be fulfilled. Why will anyone continue to be productive over time when 60% of your efforts is given to the unproductive. Big government with the associated necessary high taxes are the opposite of freedom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4-z1Ih0ImM
The brown-shirts oops I meant purple-shirts are next. This looks a lot like Americas version of National Socialism. Progressivism creates false expectations among the poor that cannot be fulfilled. Why will anyone continue to be productive over time when 60% of your efforts is given to the unproductive. Big government with the associated necessary high taxes are the opposite of freedom.
Another Liberal created mess they will try and pin on the Conservatives. They are once again saying Bush did it!
Video: Frank in 2005 — Bubble? What bubble?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW5qKYfqALE&playnext_from=TL&videos=lAgmOysFG9U&feature=recentf
excerpts with my additions from a post at 11:35 am on April 24, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Barney Frank argued this week that he had always warned about the excesses of pushing home ownership and had advocated for rentals instead. Our friends at Verum Serum couldn’t believe their ears, because Frank has long been one of the loudest voices supporting the CRA and Fannie/Freddie policies that encouraged irresponsible lending. Here’s Frank making that clear on the floor of Congress on June 27, 2005, in support of the recognition of National Home Ownership Month:
I think we have an excessive degree of concern right now about home ownership and its role in the economy. Obviously, speculation is never a good thing. But those who argue that housing prices are now at the point of a bubble seem to me to missing a very important point. Unlike previous examples we have had, where substantial excessive inflation of prices later caused some problems, we are talking here about an entity — home ownership, homes — where there is not the degree of leverage we have seen elsewhere. This is not the dot-com situation; we have problems with people having invested in business plans for which there was no reality. People building fiber-optic cable for which there was no need. Homes that are occupied may see an ebb and flow in the price at a certain percentage level, but you’re not going to see the collapse that you see when people talk about a bubble. And so, those of us on our committee in particular, will continue to push for home ownership.
Now check what Frank claims was his position all along:
Now, suddenly, home ownership was a conservative idea, and Frank suddenly realizes that people should only buy houses when they can afford them. Only a politician could lie with such a lack of conscience, but with a surfeit of sanctimony.
His “Bubble? What bubble?” performance in June 2005 should become required viewing for anyone who wants the real history of how the economy collapsed. In another addition to the Someone Left The Irony On Department, Frank scolds the people behind the dot-com bubble for not having realistic business plans while Frank protected Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from regulators who warned that the two GSEs had the same exact problem. And Frank was right that the housing collapse wouldn’t be as bad as the dot-com pop — but in fact it was much, much worse, thanks to Congressional action that mandated the creation of mortgage-backed securities that spread the poison of bad loans throughout the global financial system. The dot-com bubble burst resulted in a mild recession, but Frank’s supposedly-impossible housing bubble collapse sent the entire world economy crashing into a heap.
Clueless? A liar? In this case, Frank qualifies as both.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW5qKYfqALE&playnext_from=TL&videos=lAgmOysFG9U&feature=recentf
excerpts with my additions from a post at 11:35 am on April 24, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Barney Frank argued this week that he had always warned about the excesses of pushing home ownership and had advocated for rentals instead. Our friends at Verum Serum couldn’t believe their ears, because Frank has long been one of the loudest voices supporting the CRA and Fannie/Freddie policies that encouraged irresponsible lending. Here’s Frank making that clear on the floor of Congress on June 27, 2005, in support of the recognition of National Home Ownership Month:
I think we have an excessive degree of concern right now about home ownership and its role in the economy. Obviously, speculation is never a good thing. But those who argue that housing prices are now at the point of a bubble seem to me to missing a very important point. Unlike previous examples we have had, where substantial excessive inflation of prices later caused some problems, we are talking here about an entity — home ownership, homes — where there is not the degree of leverage we have seen elsewhere. This is not the dot-com situation; we have problems with people having invested in business plans for which there was no reality. People building fiber-optic cable for which there was no need. Homes that are occupied may see an ebb and flow in the price at a certain percentage level, but you’re not going to see the collapse that you see when people talk about a bubble. And so, those of us on our committee in particular, will continue to push for home ownership.
Now check what Frank claims was his position all along:
Now, suddenly, home ownership was a conservative idea, and Frank suddenly realizes that people should only buy houses when they can afford them. Only a politician could lie with such a lack of conscience, but with a surfeit of sanctimony.
His “Bubble? What bubble?” performance in June 2005 should become required viewing for anyone who wants the real history of how the economy collapsed. In another addition to the Someone Left The Irony On Department, Frank scolds the people behind the dot-com bubble for not having realistic business plans while Frank protected Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from regulators who warned that the two GSEs had the same exact problem. And Frank was right that the housing collapse wouldn’t be as bad as the dot-com pop — but in fact it was much, much worse, thanks to Congressional action that mandated the creation of mortgage-backed securities that spread the poison of bad loans throughout the global financial system. The dot-com bubble burst resulted in a mild recession, but Frank’s supposedly-impossible housing bubble collapse sent the entire world economy crashing into a heap.
Clueless? A liar? In this case, Frank qualifies as both.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Obama letter to congress begging for another 50 billion bailout to go to the Unions
"Democrats are showing either that they just don't get it on this issue of the debt, or that they just don't care," Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said in a reaction to the Obama letter to congress begging for another 50 billion bailout to go to the Unions. "You can understand the American people's skepticism when they're told that simply adding more government is the solution to government's previous failures."
Recent Events and my observations on them
My You Tube page http://www.youtube.com/user/dsmith6289 - Tim Adams a former senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu during 2008 said
"I had direct access to the Social Security database, the national crime computer, state driver's license information, international passport information, basically just about anything you can imagine to get someone's identity....I could look up what bank your home mortgage was in. I was informed by my boss that we did not have a birth record [for Obama]. They ( both hospitals) told us, 'We don't have a birth certificate for him,'" he said. They told my supervisor, either by phone or by e-mail, neither one has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were present at this man's birth.
Why are we drilling in 5,000 feet of water in the first place? Environmentalists have driven us out there. The environmentalists have succeeded in rendering the Pacific and nearly all the Atlantic coast off-limits to oil production. We have been stopped by the environmentalists from drilling any where on our own land. Bush and Reagan did it is all you will hear from the left. There will always be catastrophic oil spills. We can only reduce the chances and minimize the damage. Not that the environmentalists are the only ones to blame. But it is unbelievable that they've escaped any mention at all from the mainstream media.
How about some more of that Obama transparency on the Sestak job offer. More like the age old Chicago corrupt politics and business as usual not the change we were promised. The Israelis know how to handle those peaceful protesters from the left. Mohammad is a punk, for allowing his followers to intentionally murder innocent women and children. This cannot be justified in any circumstance. Anyone involved in these acts needs to be exterminated also. The sooner the left acknowledges this the better. They only condone violence if their power or entitlements are threatened (see Immigration, Greece or France protests).
"I had direct access to the Social Security database, the national crime computer, state driver's license information, international passport information, basically just about anything you can imagine to get someone's identity....I could look up what bank your home mortgage was in. I was informed by my boss that we did not have a birth record [for Obama]. They ( both hospitals) told us, 'We don't have a birth certificate for him,'" he said. They told my supervisor, either by phone or by e-mail, neither one has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were present at this man's birth.
Why are we drilling in 5,000 feet of water in the first place? Environmentalists have driven us out there. The environmentalists have succeeded in rendering the Pacific and nearly all the Atlantic coast off-limits to oil production. We have been stopped by the environmentalists from drilling any where on our own land. Bush and Reagan did it is all you will hear from the left. There will always be catastrophic oil spills. We can only reduce the chances and minimize the damage. Not that the environmentalists are the only ones to blame. But it is unbelievable that they've escaped any mention at all from the mainstream media.
How about some more of that Obama transparency on the Sestak job offer. More like the age old Chicago corrupt politics and business as usual not the change we were promised. The Israelis know how to handle those peaceful protesters from the left. Mohammad is a punk, for allowing his followers to intentionally murder innocent women and children. This cannot be justified in any circumstance. Anyone involved in these acts needs to be exterminated also. The sooner the left acknowledges this the better. They only condone violence if their power or entitlements are threatened (see Immigration, Greece or France protests).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)