Obama's Cordray Appointment Mocks the Constitution
By Phil Kerpen Published January 04, 2012 | FoxNews.com
In 2008 candidate Sen. Barack Obama famously said: “This is part of the whole theory of George Bush
that he can make laws as he is going along. I disagree with that. I
taught the Constitution for 10 years. I believe in the Constitution and I
will obey the Constitution of the United States. We are not going to use signing statements as a way of doing and end run around Congress.”
Now, we find that not only was he kidding about signing statements – he recently used one
to ignore about 20 provisions of the omnibus spending bill – but Obama
also believes he can decide for himself that the Senate is in recess
when it is not, overturn at least a hundred years of precedent, and
bypass the Constitution’s advice and consent requirement.
Moreover,
the president now considers it a political virtue that he is doing
precisely what he criticized George Bush for doing: “make laws as he is
going along.” Obama now says: “I refuse to take 'No' for an answer… when
Congress refuses to act in a way that hurts our economy and puts people
at risk, I have an obligation as president to do what I can without
them.”
If
he were acting within the confines of the law and the Constitution, the
argument might make sense. But Obama has now adopted a theory of
executive power so expansive that a reporter at a recent press
conference understandably asked whether the president believes we have a
virtual monarchy, a president of unlimited powers subject only to
periodic elections but not to the rule of law.
According to a 1993 brief from the Clinton Justice Department,
Congress must remain adjourned for at least three days before the
adjournment constitutes a “recess” for the purposes the recess
appointment power.
The
origin of this three day period is Article I, Section 5 of the
Constitution, which states: “Neither House, during the Session of
Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than
three days.”
In
other words, the president can only recess appoint when the Senate has
adjourned for more than three days, and the Senate cannot adjourn for
more than three days without the consent of the House. Speaker John Boehner has properly withheld that consent to prevent Obama from installing radical appointees into key positions.
There is recent precedent for this action and for its legitimacy. In fact, then-Obama Solicitor General Elena Kagan wrote to the Supreme Court
on April 26, 2010: “Although a President may fill such vacancies
through the use of his recess appointment power … the Senate may act to
foreclose this option by declining to recess for more than two or three
days at a time over a lengthy period. For example, the Senate did not
recess intrasession for more than three days at a time for over a year
beginning in late 2007.”
Obama’s attempt to “recess appoint” Richard Cordray while the Senate is in pro forma session is especially galling in light of the history of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(CFPB) and the broad powers that Cordray – if Obama’s sleight of hand
is permitted by the courts – will wield over the United States economy.
The
CFPB has the power to interfere with every consumer financial
transaction in the economy. It is housed in the Federal Reserve and
funded out of Fed operations, not congressional appropriations, avoiding
effective congressional oversight.
All power is vested in one individual – now, presumably Cordray – with no board or commission. None of this was part of Elizabeth Warren’s
original design, which included a five-member commission that was
funded and overseen by Congress. Senate Republicans have correctly
called for reforms to make the new agency accountable before confirming a
nominee and allowing it to begin writing rules that could have a major
negative impact on the economy.
Obama doesn’t care. He’s making is up as he goes along. What a difference four years makes.
Phil Kerpenis vice president for policy at Americans for Prosperity and author of Democracy Denied: How Obama is Ignoring You and Bypassing Congress to Radically Transform America – and How to Stop Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment