Showing posts with label fare share. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fare share. Show all posts

Sunday, May 13, 2012

We are turning a sustainable safety net into a Ponzi scheme hammock!

I am sick and tired of the obvious bias and twisting of the truth by the mainstream media and many professors at our tax funded Universities. What is fair about punishing hard work thru excessive taxation then perpetuating poverty by regulating poor entrepreneurs out of business? We need to allow free mobility of the poor to move up the social-economic ladder instead of locking them into the ghetto with the permanent underclass. I am not advocating the wholesale elimination of our social programs but instead a minimal amount as required to help the unfortunate poorest among us survive while having some programs available providing the needed tools for those willing to work hard thus move up the social economic ladder.

Below is a great article I read published on Canada free Press.

Democrats most often divide Americans along cultural lines then employs class envy

Cultural deconstruction: turning a safety net into a hammock

Author
- David Coughlin  Wednesday, September 7, 2011

The Democrat political strategy is to segment the American people into constituency classes that can be served separately.  Al Gore made a Freudian slip when he admitted while campaigning that “We can build a collective civic space large enough for all our separate identities, that we can be E Pluribus Unum—out of one, many.”


Democrats most often divide Americans along cultural lines (region, race, ethnicity, religion, and personal values), rather than along economic lines. The party then employs class envy as an explicit strategy for righting perceived wrongs and offering a goal of future class equity. This strategy tends to be very divisive, pitting one class vs. another in a zero sum game, never completely satisfying any constituent class.

Political power is ensured by retaining this underclass as a permanent voting bloc that can be exploited for ongoing political support. Unfortunately nurturing a permanent underclass for political purposes has had unintended cultural consequences, which may eventually

The purpose of welfare is to assist individuals in need and ultimately to help welfare recipients out of poverty and make them self-sufficient.  Medicare was originally designed in 1965 as a Great Society health insurance program for all Americans age 65 and older and for the permanent physically disabled, funded by payroll taxes.  Medicaid is the means tested health program created in 1965 as part of the War on Poverty for people with low incomes and resources, jointly funded by the state and federal governments, and managed by the states.  These social insurance programs have expanded well beyond their original intents, and the unintended consequences has been to grow dependence on government support, instead of a return to self sufficiency. After the Great Society legislation of the 1960s, for the first time a person who was not elderly or disabled could receive a living from the American government.  President Franklin D. Roosevelt said in 1935, “Continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.”  Social Security and Medicare are rapidly approaching bankruptcy, spending more money each year than is collected.  The destructiveness of welfare goes beyond financial affordability and political dependency. 
The more welfare that families receive from government, the less fathers are necessary for their support, undermining the basic building block of society, the family unit.  Lacking the role model of a responsible father, children grow up to believe that dependency is a natural condition of life.  The children of welfare moms are nurtured in a mentality that perpetuates dependency from generation to generation.  The impact of food stamps, Section 8 housing subsidies, Medicaid, and other support programs has been to create a permanent welfare class who, in terms of skills and attitudes, are poorly equipped to return to work.  The U.S. has spent $16 trillion since LBJ launched his “War on Poverty” in 1964, but the percentage of people in “poverty” remains essentially the same.  Despite the fact that illegal aliens do not contribute to the program funding, many states cover them despite explicitly being excluded.  Our culture has eroded so much now that dependence on the government has become an acceptable lifestyle for the permanent underclass, which has transformed our temporary economic “safety net” into a comfortable “hammock” for long term living.
By design Democrats have deconstructed our American culture into a loose confederation of disparate class cultures on the verge of open class warfare.  Democrats have nurtured an underclass politically dependent with a well developed sense of entitlement, which has taught generations that society owes them a living; that government is responsible for raising their children; working is not necessary; and everyone is entitled to the fruits of other people’s labor.  This policy shows a reckless disregard for the consequences of dependency, which will be terrible. 
Welfare-state paternalism has bred and nurtured immoral, undesirable people because government entitlements create one of two attitudes towards society: either ingratitude or resentment.  If they receive what they’re entitled to, there is nothing to be grateful for because you’re entitled to it.  If they haven’t received an entitlement, then they’re resentful because you haven’t received what you feel you are entitled to.  Evidence of this resentment can be seen in the black “flash mobs” attacking randomly in a number of U.S. cities and the U.K. hoodlum riots attacking random businesses.  We should expect to see more of this violence at the Day of Rage starting on September 17th, since it was originally planned for non-violent protests in three cities, but has already expanded to a week of civil disobedience in at least ten cities.
Nothing less than a culture re-construction is needed to recover from the degradation of our western society.  We must resurrect the culture of personal responsibility.  We must re-teach the cause and effect relationship between hard work and achievement.  Relearning the art of parental discipline, and re-establishing the primacy of the moral code upon which western civilization was built are monumental but necessary tasks.  I hope we are not too late because it will take generations to undo the harm done to our culture.  Ultimately the concept of entitlement must be dismantled from the welfare state.
The Democrats have embraced class warfare as their primary political tactic.  The unintended (or perhaps intended) consequence has been the creation of a permanent underclass totally dependent on the government for their well-being.  Political power is maintained by retaining this dependence in exchange for political support.  Unless you are an unrepentant Marxist praying for a class uprising, this permanent underclass is condemned to a government subsistence existence and an inability to participate in the American Dream.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

The Lefts Bush debt is the same as Obama debt lie.

The Lefts Bush debt is the same as Obama debt lie.

The Leftists love to say that Reagan and Bush were as bad as Obama is regarding spending but that is a lie easily disproved. Even though both Reagan and Bush had some deficit spending of which I do not condone. Obama has taken borrowing and spending to unprecedented unsustainable levels. If we do not reverse this immediately we will never recover. With the Democratic policies increasing spending to well over 20% of GDP that alone will crush this exceptional country in it self. Their lefts explenation is that we do not tax rich enough if we taxed them at 22 to 25% of GDP that also will crush this country as this level of taxation has never been sustainable ever in any recorded history. The Laffer curve proves this well as you raise taxes above a certain point revenue always goes down. When will some people get it that the Socialist utopian dream a good idea in theory always collapses on itself and even more suffer then before after its implementation.


The Following article below by Claude Sandroff covers the subject quite well.

The Obama Legacy: Debt of $50,000 per Second


Barack Obama is three times the man George W. Bush was, at least as measured by the rate at which each was able to pile on to America’s debt.  In the first 945 days of his presidency
Obama has amassed the debt it took Bush his full two terms to accumulate. Behold, the profligate son!
Tripling down on Bush’s legacy was no easy task for the community organizer from Illinois whose predecessor spent with abandon because he was assaulted by foreign attacks on the homeland, opened two theaters of war, created a brand new federal entitlement and never vetoed a spending bill. But Obama has shown that, “Yes we can”, do worse than Bush, through failed Keynesian stimulus, unfettered environment regulation, drilling moratoriums, healthcare takeovers, nationalization of industry and anti-business hatred that suffocates the animal spirits that alone can cure high unemployment by unleashing our legion of risk takers.
No president in history has burdened us so massively, so quickly. Never have so many owed so much to so few creditors. And we have so little to show for it. Unlike the situation in 1945, when we last owed this much, Americans don’t sit solidly astride a numb, defeated world, full of confidence while reigning as the most powerful and benevolent nation in human history. Though their country is still unrivaled as a global military power and force for stability, Americans now are somewhat shaken and insecure given how much they owe.
Americans are deeply despondent, many on the verge of economic surrender, having given up looking for full time employment. Those Americans who remain working are increasing furious at being forced to generously support the untaxed masses yearning to collect unending unemployment checks and food stamps. The most successful Americans, defined by Obama as earning $200,000 per year are subjected to special scorn. They must have come into that money dishonestly, through theft or unearned inheritance, because Obama is insisting that they pay back their fair share of it.
As it is virtually impossible to recall a memorable phrase uttered by our ever blabbering president it is equally difficult to attach a favorable economic statistic or policy to his time in office.
His Keynesian experiment in stimulus cost us roughly $1 trillion and left us with even higher unemployment after its implementation. The rogue gallery of economic incompetents that crafted and defended Obama’s current economic disaster-Christine Romer, Jared Bernstein, Larry Summers and Austin Goolsbee-have skulked away from Obama’s orbit to the previous safety of their sinecures as tenured university professors and think tanks grandees. Only Timothy Geithner remains whose most recent laughable economic pronouncement was his guarantee that America’s credit rating would never suffer a downgrade.
Like their reality-challenged boss most of these left-wing true-believers are convinced that their economic plan actually worked and would have been even more effective if only the politicians had the courage to allow the original 2009 stimulus to be even bigger. The Obama crew resembles the plague of unapologetic socialists who claimed that socialism was never a failure. It was rather its specific, imperfect versions concretized as Russian Leninism, Chinese Maoism and Eastern Bloc communism that were at fault.
Obama and his cadre of committed collectivists apparently dare not look at economic policies that demonstrably and effectively worked to increase economic growth and lower unemployment, year after year with low inflation. Such policies last belonged to Ronald Reagan. It was common in the 1980’s to savage Reagan’s budget deficits of 4-5% of GDP as immorally excessive spending that would bankrupt our children. Those children are now grown up and they voted for Obama in large numbers only to see him double those deficits, not only for today but as far into the future as the Office of Management and Budget can see. The difference is that Reagan’s manageable deficits led to GDP growth as high as 8% while economic growth accompanying Obama’s crippling deficits was only 0.7% for the first six months of 2011. Thus while Obama’s mythmakers create economic statistics out of thin air (“jobs created or saved”) in hopes of salvaging a flailing administration, objective reality paints a very clear picture. Under Reagan’s policies promoting low tax rates, reduced regulation and a strong dollar the American economy grew ten times faster than it does now under Obama. Can Obama fathom that indebting us three times faster than Bush and lauding policies leading to ten times slower economic growth than under Reagan should hint at some kind of a policy change? Even Ben Bernanke, in his recent speech in Jackson Hole, has at least temporarily given up on his policy of endless stimulus, offering the markets no new promise of an extra round of quantitative easing. Bernanke did nothing and the market was relieved and rallied.  Obama, on the other hand, brimming with inexperience and arrogance, and completely divorced from reality simply cannot grasp how valuable his doing nothing would be for all of us.

This Political commentary link below from Andrew Malcolm published August 23, 2011 in the LA Times explains it quite well.

New national debt data: It's growing about $3 million a minute, even during his vacation

Swallow all liquids in your mouth before reading any further.
Updated numbers for the national debt are just out: It's now $14,639,000,000,000.
When Barack Obama took the oath of office twice on Jan. 20, 2009, CBS' amazing number cruncher Mark Knoller reports, the national debt was $10,626,000,000,000.
That means the debt that our federal government owes a whole lot of somebodies including China has increased $4,247,000,000,000 in just 945 days. That's the fastest increase under any president ever.
Remember the day the Democrat promised to close the embarrassing Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility within one year? That day the national debt increased $4,247,000,000. And each day since that the facility hasn't been closed.
Same for the day in 2009 when Obama flew all the way out to Denver to sign the $787 billion stimulus bill that was going to hold national unemployment beneath 8% instead of the 9.1% we got today anyway? Another $4,247,000,000 that day. And every day since, even Obama golfing and vacation days.
Same sum for the day Obama flew Air Force One nearly four hours roundtrip to Columbus, Ohio for a 10-minute speech about how well the stimulus was working in the politically crucial Buckeye state. Ohio's unemployment rate just jumped to 9% from 8.8% anyway.Obama stops his tour bus to Eat some Ice Cream in Iowa 8-16-11
Or last week's three-day Midwestern tour in the president's new $1.1 million Death Star bus? National debt went up $16,988,000,000 while he rode around speaking and buying ice cream cones.
Numbers with that many digits are hard to grasp, even for a Harvard head. So, let's put it another way:
One billion seconds ago Bill Clinton was nearing the end of his two terms and George W. Bush's baseball collection was still on the shelves in the Austin governor's office.
The nation's debt increased $4.9 trillion under President Bush too, btw. But it took him 2,648 days to do it. Obama will surpass that sum during this term.
Now, how to portray a trillion, or 1,000 billions. One trillion seconds ago much of North America was still covered by ice sheets hundreds of feet thick. And the land was dotted by only a few dozen Starbuck's.
Obama is saying yes, we can get control of the national debt. But ominously every time he says that he adds that trillions of dollars in infrastructure repairs are badly needed across the country. And with interest rates so low, according to the thinking on Obama's planet, now is an excellent time to borrow even more money.
So, it looks like not too long before Americans learn what comes after 1,000 trillions.
It's quadrillion. But for Bernanke's sake, please don't tell anyone in Washington.